Congresswoman Schakowsky's truth-telling tweet that enraged the right:
4 years ago, a woman could have lost her coverage if she became sick or pregnant. No longer, thanks to #ACA. #healthcare4all
— Jan Schakowsky (@janschakowsky) March 22, 2014
Her lies attacking Schakowsky:
What a shameful lie MT @janschakowsky 4 yrs ago a woman could have lost her coverage if she became sick, pregnant. No longer thanks to #ACA.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
I didn’t lose my coverage, @janschakowsky when I became pregnant. My MIL didn’t lose her coverage when she became sick. Please apologize.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
Nothing says #waronwomen like assuming we women are dumb enough to believe that propaganda, right @janschakowsky ?
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
FYI @janschakowsky , women on ACA exchange in STL under BCBC no longer have access to cancer centers they had access to FOUR YEARS AGO.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
Want to know how I know, @janschakowsky ? Because BCBC announced it and in STL I had BCBC. So does a friend, who is battling breast cancer.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
Curious as to why @janschakowsky is misleading women. How is it empowering to lie to us? Offensive to assume females are that stupid.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
It's you, Dana, that's disgracing your gender!
Is @janschakowsky misleading women because she, a lawmaker, doesn’t know the law?? Or is it a malicious lie? Which?
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
The malicious liar is you, Mrs. Loesch!
I have many listeners in your area, @janschakowsky , and they would like to know why you are misleading them. You care that little?
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
And what does it say re the strength and character of a female elected official that she either knows so little or is so willing to lie?
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
It represents women horribly for @janschakowsky to exploit them with propaganda. Women deserve better.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
Who's exploiting women now? Certainly not Ms. Schakowsky, Sandra Fluke, or other Democrats.
“Oh no! March 31 is coming and we are millions short of our goal! Better scare us up some wimmins to enroll!”
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
. @janschakowsky needs to retract and apologize for her lie. This was already illegal BEFORE ACA https://t.co/b1eBIqM1f5
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
“It’s Women’s History Month. No better way to honor women than by assuming they’re all idiots and will believe our healthcare lies.”
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
“It’s Women’s History Month. Let’s honor those who campaigned to get gov’t out of our lives by begging gov’t to get back IN our lives.”
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
“It’s Women’s History Month. Let’s celebrate women’s independence from men by making them pay for things we can buy ourselves.”
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
“It’s Women’s History Month. Remember that time Susan B. Anthony twerked for health care?”
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
“It’s Women’s History Month. Sign up to pay 46% more for worse care because of this cat. Women love cats.”
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) March 23, 2014
No comments :
Post a Comment