The New York Times' Adam Nagourney:
He said he would continue holding a daily news conference; on Saturday, it drew one reporter and one photographer, so Mr. Bundy used the time to officiate at what was in effect a town meeting with supporters, discussing, in a long, loping discourse, the prevalence of abortion, the abuses of welfare and his views on race.
“I want to tell you one more thing I know about the Negro,” he said. Mr. Bundy recalled driving past a public-housing project in North Las Vegas, “and in front of that government house the door was usually open and the older people and the kids — and there is always at least a half a dozen people sitting on the porch — they didn’t have nothing to do. They didn’t have nothing for their kids to do. They didn’t have nothing for their young girls to do.
“And because they were basically on government subsidy, so now what do they do?” he asked. “They abort their young children, they put their young men in jail, because they never learned how to pick cotton. And I’ve often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy? They didn’t get no more freedom. They got less freedom.”
Jonathan Topaz at Politico:
Loesch said that Bundy’s comments might have been aimed at “decrying what big government has done to the black family,” as opposed to necessarily being racist remarks. She said the Bundy affair is primarily about “government overreach.”
“If Bundy is a racist, that is awful,” she wrote, “but what exactly does that have to do with the [Bureau of Land Management]? I’ve been saying for weeks that this isn’t about one rancher. It’s about government overreach.”
Loesch concluded by suggesting that liberals are trying to distract from government overreach by focusing the story exclusively on Bundy.
Dana Loesch, though, isn’t so sure. Faced with Bundy’s remarks, the conservative media powerhouse rushed to keyboard to comment. She wrote “I was alerted to this story this evening in the NYT on rancher Cliven Bundy which featured a quote I was told was racist, and therefor I should apologize for ever criticizing the Bureau of Land Management’s handling of this and other situations,” and then blockquoted the Timespiece. Granting that the quote is “odd” and that it “sounds” racist, Loesch went on to explain that even if the guy didn’t express himself “perfectly,” he kinda had a point (emphasis mine):
A few things. First, to take the quote at face value it’s odd and sounds offensive. You’re talking about government overreach and you go into this story? Secondly, I hope no one is surprised that an old man rancher isn’t media trained to express himself perfectly. He seems to be decrying what big government has done to the black family — which big government has negatively affected not just the black family, but all families regardless of ethnicity — so perhaps he included that in his remarks against big government?
In Loesch’s defense, and I mean this sincerely, what Bundy said is the kind of thing that mainstream Republicans say all the time, it is mainstream Republican thought. The only difference is they don’t usually use the word “Negro,” or something close. Watching them scramble to get away from the Bundy grenade is comical, because they are the ones who armed it and pulled the pin.Video of Cliven Bundy's racist comments, via MMFA's 2nd YouTube Channel:
Loesch has defended Cliven Bundy repeatedly over the past two weeks.
More excuse-making for Bundy's racism by her on Twitter:
Can someone tell me how this quote I’m seeing from Bundy makes Tommy Henderson, Raymond Yowell, or others at odds with BLM racists? Thx.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
On Cliven Bundy's Remark: http://t.co/BjAhBHxE9Q
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
Apparently Bundy’s remark means everyone who dislikes the BLM’s actions is a racist, folks: http://t.co/BjAhBHxE9Q
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
Please employ reading comprehension before you lose that status, gents @mmfa .
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
She takes a shot at MMFA, one of her arch-nemeses.
Because Bundy made an awful remark ranchers in north Texas deserve to have their private property claimed by BLM. http://t.co/BjAhBHxE9Q
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
This is why I told people *for weeks* that BLM is more than just one rancher. About an overreaching entity, not him. http://t.co/BjAhBHxE9Q
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
Just like you’re racists for dissenting on Obamacare, so too are you racist for criticizing the BLM because Cliven Bundy.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
RACIST RT @BenHowe: The intellectually CONSISTENT position is to still be against BLM actions both before and after Bundy’s idiocy.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
RACIST MT @mikedelta10: @DLoesch Just this. there are many other ranchers are having problems w/ BLM, USFS, etc. BundyRanch is not only 1
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
RACIST RT @JimmyJames38: @DLoesch if, IF, he actually said those things. Is there video or audio, or just what the nyt is 'reporting'?
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
RACIST RT @McShauno: @DLoesch @BenHowe the BLM is an issue even before we all knew anything about the Bundy Ranch.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
If Rand Paul or Dean Heller criticize the BLM after Bundy’s remark they are just as racist as he is!1!
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
Wow @JonathanTopaz , you really need to work on your reading comprehension with your ridiculous smear piece http://t.co/OVJC8RhEQc
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
Curious why Politico's @JonathanTopaz didn't actually do the reporter's job of reaching out to his targets for comment?
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
On Politico's hit job and Bundy: http://t.co/FWRCUPR7G3
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
Again, show me where I defended Bundy's remark? http://t.co/FWRCUPR7G3 , http://t.co/BjAhBHxE9Q Idiots.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014
You're lying, Dana! You DID defend his racist remark.
But the left will act otherwise because they want to invalidate BLM criticism. https://t.co/eypk1S1riQ
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) April 24, 2014